<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 121 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91011</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s decision to confiscate silk yarn seized by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence at Varanasi. The tribunal found the appellants&#039; arguments credible, pointing out reasonable explanations for alleged discrepancies in pricing, markings, and invoicing of the goods. Despite test results by the Central Silk Board, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing their appeals and eliminating penalty imposition. The decision hinged on the tribunal&#039;s assessment of evidence and rejection of the Collector&#039;s justifications for confiscation, ultimately supporting the appellants&#039; assertion of the goods&#039; lawful import and clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 121 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91011</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s decision to confiscate silk yarn seized by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence at Varanasi. The tribunal found the appellants&#039; arguments credible, pointing out reasonable explanations for alleged discrepancies in pricing, markings, and invoicing of the goods. Despite test results by the Central Silk Board, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing their appeals and eliminating penalty imposition. The decision hinged on the tribunal&#039;s assessment of evidence and rejection of the Collector&#039;s justifications for confiscation, ultimately supporting the appellants&#039; assertion of the goods&#039; lawful import and clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>