<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90991</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on glass bottles and plastic crates used for packing aerated waters was treated as available only where the packing material cost formed part of the assessable value. The certificate relied upon was found insufficient to prove that inclusion, and it was given undue weight. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh determination after verification of the relevant evidence to be produced by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90991</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on glass bottles and plastic crates used for packing aerated waters was treated as available only where the packing material cost formed part of the assessable value. The certificate relied upon was found insufficient to prove that inclusion, and it was given undue weight. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh determination after verification of the relevant evidence to be produced by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>