<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90976</link>
    <description>Imported molecular sieve batteries used in an air separation plant were analysed for tariff classification by reference to their essential function. The equipment removed moisture, carbon dioxide and acetylene from compressed process air by adsorption after solid particles had already been filtered out. Because the dominant function was gas separation and purification, and not treatment involving heating, cooling, drying or any other change of temperature, the equipment was treated as filtering or purifying machinery for gases rather than machinery for temperature-based treatment. The importer&#039;s supporting authorities were found not to apply, and the classification was sustained under the gas-purification heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:45:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90976</link>
      <description>Imported molecular sieve batteries used in an air separation plant were analysed for tariff classification by reference to their essential function. The equipment removed moisture, carbon dioxide and acetylene from compressed process air by adsorption after solid particles had already been filtered out. Because the dominant function was gas separation and purification, and not treatment involving heating, cooling, drying or any other change of temperature, the equipment was treated as filtering or purifying machinery for gases rather than machinery for temperature-based treatment. The importer&#039;s supporting authorities were found not to apply, and the classification was sustained under the gas-purification heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>