<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 202 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90971</link>
    <description>Pressure transducer components were held classifiable under Heading 9026.90 rather than Heading 8541.50 because parts and components of transducers follow the tariff treatment applicable to the complete transducer. The goods also did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 91/89-Customs, as they were treated as semiconductors covered by serial No. 6 of the notification&#039;s table. On both issues, the departmental view was upheld and the exemption claim rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 202 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90971</link>
      <description>Pressure transducer components were held classifiable under Heading 9026.90 rather than Heading 8541.50 because parts and components of transducers follow the tariff treatment applicable to the complete transducer. The goods also did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 91/89-Customs, as they were treated as semiconductors covered by serial No. 6 of the notification&#039;s table. On both issues, the departmental view was upheld and the exemption claim rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>