<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered whether the department&#039;s reference application on the question arising under Rule 57F(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was fit to be sent to the High Court. Following its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own matter, it treated the issue as one appropriate for reference rather than rejecting it on merits. The specific question formulated by the Tribunal was accordingly referred to the High Court, and the reference application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:59:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered whether the department&#039;s reference application on the question arising under Rule 57F(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was fit to be sent to the High Court. Following its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own matter, it treated the issue as one appropriate for reference rather than rejecting it on merits. The specific question formulated by the Tribunal was accordingly referred to the High Court, and the reference application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>