<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90930</link>
    <description>Denatured ethyl alcohol was not shown on the material placed on record to be dutiable under Tariff Heading 2204, because the composition evidence was incomplete and did not satisfactorily disclose the relevant water content. The earlier decisions relied on were distinguishable on their specific composition findings, so the claim of dutiability was not substantiated on the available record. The notice was also held time-barred because the department had prior knowledge of the appellant&#039;s manufacture of denatured spirit through earlier correspondence and related examination of dutiability, making a notice issued beyond the normal six-month period unsustainable. As a result, the duty demand and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90930</link>
      <description>Denatured ethyl alcohol was not shown on the material placed on record to be dutiable under Tariff Heading 2204, because the composition evidence was incomplete and did not satisfactorily disclose the relevant water content. The earlier decisions relied on were distinguishable on their specific composition findings, so the claim of dutiability was not substantiated on the available record. The notice was also held time-barred because the department had prior knowledge of the appellant&#039;s manufacture of denatured spirit through earlier correspondence and related examination of dutiability, making a notice issued beyond the normal six-month period unsustainable. As a result, the duty demand and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>