<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90925</link>
    <description>Exports made under bond were governed by the special conditions in the relevant excise notification, including receipt of payment in freely convertible currency. Once the exporter elected to use that procedure, compliance with every attached condition was mandatory. Failure to satisfy the currency-condition meant the notification benefit could not be retained, and the duty demand remained enforceable under the excise provisions. The demand was upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:01:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90925</link>
      <description>Exports made under bond were governed by the special conditions in the relevant excise notification, including receipt of payment in freely convertible currency. Once the exporter elected to use that procedure, compliance with every attached condition was mandatory. Failure to satisfy the currency-condition meant the notification benefit could not be retained, and the duty demand remained enforceable under the excise provisions. The demand was upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>