<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 221 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90920</link>
    <description>The appeals involved challenges against duty demands on laminated sheets sold to Railways, focusing on adherence to ISI Specifications and grading disputes. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that all grades met ISI Standards and rejecting the presumption that only Grade I complied. The impugned orders were set aside, and penalties revoked, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 221 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90920</link>
      <description>The appeals involved challenges against duty demands on laminated sheets sold to Railways, focusing on adherence to ISI Specifications and grading disputes. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that all grades met ISI Standards and rejecting the presumption that only Grade I complied. The impugned orders were set aside, and penalties revoked, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>