<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to confiscate 51 Fax machines from a courier company, imposing a redemption fine and customs duty. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments of being bona fide purchasers, the Tribunal found the machines were of foreign origin and not lawfully imported. It deemed the redemption fine as equitable, not penal, and held the duty demand against the appellants as legally sustainable under the Customs Act, ultimately rejecting the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:02:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to confiscate 51 Fax machines from a courier company, imposing a redemption fine and customs duty. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments of being bona fide purchasers, the Tribunal found the machines were of foreign origin and not lawfully imported. It deemed the redemption fine as equitable, not penal, and held the duty demand against the appellants as legally sustainable under the Customs Act, ultimately rejecting the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>