https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90885 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand, penalty imposition, and interest. The judgment upheld the legality of different prices for different classes of buyers, justified the lower price for a specific buyer based on quantity differences, and emphasized the need for evidence to support allegations of fictitious transactions before imposing penalties. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90885 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand, penalty imposition, and interest. The judgment upheld the legality of different prices for different classes of buyers, justified the lower price for a specific buyer based on quantity differences, and emphasized the need for evidence to support allegations of fictitious transactions before imposing penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90885