https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90883 Pending final hearing, the Calcutta HC, on a prima facie basis, permitted the writ petitioner to tender 50% of the disputed duty and directed that, if paid within time, it be accepted without demur and treated as payment under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme under section 90(2). The Court indicated that it could make a provisional intervention under section 90(1) for interim purposes, while leaving the ultimate questions of maintainability and scheme coverage to final hearing. The relief was granted to preserve the petitioner's ability to obtain the scheme benefit and carried a consequential stay of the impugned demand and bank guarantees subject to compliance. en-us Mon, 01 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90883 Pending final hearing, the Calcutta HC, on a prima facie basis, permitted the writ petitioner to tender 50% of the disputed duty and directed that, if paid within time, it be accepted without demur and treated as payment under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme under section 90(2). The Court indicated that it could make a provisional intervention under section 90(1) for interim purposes, while leaving the ultimate questions of maintainability and scheme coverage to final hearing. The relief was granted to preserve the petitioner's ability to obtain the scheme benefit and carried a consequential stay of the impugned demand and bank guarantees subject to compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90883