https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90879 The Tribunal denied the miscellaneous applications seeking affidavits and documents from the Commissioner of Central Excise and Joint Secretary. It ruled that the determination of dutiability should be based on facts and provisions of Central Excise law, dismissing the applications as irrelevant. Regarding the dutiability of dry fruits sold by the appellants, the Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration without requiring predeposit of duty and penalties. The Tribunal also allowed the appeals for a stay application, emphasizing the importance of segregating processed and unprocessed goods in determining duty demand. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:36:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90879 The Tribunal denied the miscellaneous applications seeking affidavits and documents from the Commissioner of Central Excise and Joint Secretary. It ruled that the determination of dutiability should be based on facts and provisions of Central Excise law, dismissing the applications as irrelevant. Regarding the dutiability of dry fruits sold by the appellants, the Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration without requiring predeposit of duty and penalties. The Tribunal also allowed the appeals for a stay application, emphasizing the importance of segregating processed and unprocessed goods in determining duty demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90879