<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 210 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs duty demand on the excess quantity of Tin Mill Black Plate Coils cleared by the appellant beyond the specified allotment under the Ad hoc exemption Order. It ruled that Customs clearance was limited to the specified quantity, and any excess was subject to full duty without exemption. The Tribunal found the duty assessment proper, based on the applicable rate at the time of filing the Bill of Entry, and rejected the appeal, concluding that there was no justification to overturn the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 210 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs duty demand on the excess quantity of Tin Mill Black Plate Coils cleared by the appellant beyond the specified allotment under the Ad hoc exemption Order. It ruled that Customs clearance was limited to the specified quantity, and any excess was subject to full duty without exemption. The Tribunal found the duty assessment proper, based on the applicable rate at the time of filing the Bill of Entry, and rejected the appeal, concluding that there was no justification to overturn the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>