<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 207 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90874</link>
    <description>An assessee may decline to avail an exemption notification and instead pay duty on intermediate goods, as earlier Tribunal decisions were treated as supporting an optional approach to exemption. Although a contrary view was noted that an exemption notification forms part of the statute, the Tribunal followed its own prior rulings and accepted the assessee&#039;s position. On that basis, it found a prima facie case and dispensed with deposit of the duty demand and penalty, granting interim relief pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 207 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90874</link>
      <description>An assessee may decline to avail an exemption notification and instead pay duty on intermediate goods, as earlier Tribunal decisions were treated as supporting an optional approach to exemption. Although a contrary view was noted that an exemption notification forms part of the statute, the Tribunal followed its own prior rulings and accepted the assessee&#039;s position. On that basis, it found a prima facie case and dispensed with deposit of the duty demand and penalty, granting interim relief pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>