<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 197 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90864</link>
    <description>Imported coffee grinder was examined for tariff classification and exemption treatment under a notification. The machine was held not to be a domestic electro-mechanical appliance, because its literature, capacity, and industrial end use showed use in coffee curing machinery; classification under Heading 8479.82 as a machine having an individual function was accepted. On exemption, the word &quot;and&quot; in the entry for &quot;Coffee roaster and grinder for Coffee curing machinery&quot; was read disjunctively to avoid defeating the concession, so the grinder was treated as covered by the notification. The assessee was thus held entitled to the exemption and consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:50:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 197 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90864</link>
      <description>Imported coffee grinder was examined for tariff classification and exemption treatment under a notification. The machine was held not to be a domestic electro-mechanical appliance, because its literature, capacity, and industrial end use showed use in coffee curing machinery; classification under Heading 8479.82 as a machine having an individual function was accepted. On exemption, the word &quot;and&quot; in the entry for &quot;Coffee roaster and grinder for Coffee curing machinery&quot; was read disjunctively to avoid defeating the concession, so the grinder was treated as covered by the notification. The assessee was thus held entitled to the exemption and consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>