<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 185 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the orders of the Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) unsustainable due to misinterpretation of evidence. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for reevaluation, with directions to consider all evidence and expert opinions. The Assistant Commissioner was instructed to issue a detailed decision within four months, expediting proceedings with the consent of both parties. The appeal succeeded through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 185 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the orders of the Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) unsustainable due to misinterpretation of evidence. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for reevaluation, with directions to consider all evidence and expert opinions. The Assistant Commissioner was instructed to issue a detailed decision within four months, expediting proceedings with the consent of both parties. The appeal succeeded through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>