<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 155 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90848</link>
    <description>Captive inputs and their value were considered for aggregation of final-product clearances under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., where the applicants relied on an earlier Tribunal ruling on an identical issue. At the prima facie stage, the dispute was treated as covered by that precedent, and the request for stay/dispensation was accepted without conditions. Unconditional stay was therefore granted in favour of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:49:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 155 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90848</link>
      <description>Captive inputs and their value were considered for aggregation of final-product clearances under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., where the applicants relied on an earlier Tribunal ruling on an identical issue. At the prima facie stage, the dispute was treated as covered by that precedent, and the request for stay/dispensation was accepted without conditions. Unconditional stay was therefore granted in favour of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>