https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90838 The tribunal upheld the classification of imported clovestems as canalized goods, the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, and the imposition of fines and penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act and the Foreign Trade Act. The appellant's arguments challenging the classification, confiscation, and penalties were rejected, with the tribunal finding no sufficient grounds to overturn the lower authorities' decision. The penalties imposed were deemed appropriate, considering the appellant's failure to provide a valid reason for importing the goods. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:31:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90838 The tribunal upheld the classification of imported clovestems as canalized goods, the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, and the imposition of fines and penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act and the Foreign Trade Act. The appellant's arguments challenging the classification, confiscation, and penalties were rejected, with the tribunal finding no sufficient grounds to overturn the lower authorities' decision. The penalties imposed were deemed appropriate, considering the appellant's failure to provide a valid reason for importing the goods. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90838