https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90827 A Customs House Agent licence issued at Chennai under Regulation 10(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was treated as an independent licence. Renewal had to be considered under Regulation 12, and suspension or revocation under Regulation 21; the lapse of a separate Bangalore licence was not a stated ground for cancellation or refusal of renewal. Where the regulations do not expressly link the continuance of one licence to another licence at a different customs station, the later licence cannot be denied renewal solely because the earlier licence ended. The impugned cancellation was therefore unsustainable, and renewal was directed from the date of expiry. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:06:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90827 A Customs House Agent licence issued at Chennai under Regulation 10(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was treated as an independent licence. Renewal had to be considered under Regulation 12, and suspension or revocation under Regulation 21; the lapse of a separate Bangalore licence was not a stated ground for cancellation or refusal of renewal. Where the regulations do not expressly link the continuance of one licence to another licence at a different customs station, the later licence cannot be denied renewal solely because the earlier licence ended. The impugned cancellation was therefore unsustainable, and renewal was directed from the date of expiry. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90827