<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 253 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90822</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lakh by a specified date for a dispute concerning standard fitment in chassis number 1612, despite discrepancies in fitment declaration. The appellant argued a typographical error led to the wrong engine and gear box numbers being mentioned. The tribunal noted no evidence of excess amount collection and stayed the balance duty and penalty during the appeal process, with non-compliance leading to appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:51:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 253 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90822</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 lakh by a specified date for a dispute concerning standard fitment in chassis number 1612, despite discrepancies in fitment declaration. The appellant argued a typographical error led to the wrong engine and gear box numbers being mentioned. The tribunal noted no evidence of excess amount collection and stayed the balance duty and penalty during the appeal process, with non-compliance leading to appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>