<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 238 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for verification of the appellants&#039; factual pleas. If found correct, the duty refund should be granted to the appellants. The Tribunal found the denial of the benefit due to non-maintenance of separate accounts for MMSF manufactured from recycled waste and the time bar on the refund claim untenable. The matter was remanded for further verification regarding these issues and the alleged passing on of duty to buyers/consumers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 238 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for verification of the appellants&#039; factual pleas. If found correct, the duty refund should be granted to the appellants. The Tribunal found the denial of the benefit due to non-maintenance of separate accounts for MMSF manufactured from recycled waste and the time bar on the refund claim untenable. The matter was remanded for further verification regarding these issues and the alleged passing on of duty to buyers/consumers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>