https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90799 An emergency suspension power under the CHA Licensing Regulations does not dispense with the separate mandatory notice procedure before adverse action is taken. The regulatory scheme was treated as self-contained, and the urgent power under Regulation 21(2) could not override the notice requirement in Regulation 23(1) where the suspension carried grave civil consequences. Because no notice was issued, the suspension was held to breach natural justice and could not stand. The commentary further states that, unless the statute clearly excludes hearing rights, quasi-judicial authorities must disclose the case against the affected person and afford an opportunity to respond before suspension. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:11:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90799 An emergency suspension power under the CHA Licensing Regulations does not dispense with the separate mandatory notice procedure before adverse action is taken. The regulatory scheme was treated as self-contained, and the urgent power under Regulation 21(2) could not override the notice requirement in Regulation 23(1) where the suspension carried grave civil consequences. Because no notice was issued, the suspension was held to breach natural justice and could not stand. The commentary further states that, unless the statute clearly excludes hearing rights, quasi-judicial authorities must disclose the case against the affected person and afford an opportunity to respond before suspension. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90799