<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90792</link>
    <description>Notification No. 217/86 was construed as granting exemption only from Central Excise duty, and not from cess, because the notification did not expressly refer to that levy or cover it by necessary implication. An exemption from excise duty does not automatically extend to cess unless the notification specifically includes cess. On that reasoning, the exemption was unavailable in respect of cess, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:23:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90792</link>
      <description>Notification No. 217/86 was construed as granting exemption only from Central Excise duty, and not from cess, because the notification did not expressly refer to that levy or cover it by necessary implication. An exemption from excise duty does not automatically extend to cess unless the notification specifically includes cess. On that reasoning, the exemption was unavailable in respect of cess, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>