<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 310 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90786</link>
    <description>Depot clearances were treated in law as factory-gate sales, so the approved factory-gate price would ordinarily govern such removals. On the facts, however, buyers in Uttar Pradesh and buyers in West Bengal and Bihar formed different classes, making region-wise classification of buyers justified. The lower prices declared for depot clearances in the other States were therefore referable to a distinct buyer class and could not be rejected merely because a higher Uttar Pradesh factory-gate price had been declared. The price list for depot clearances was accordingly required to be accepted as declared and approved without modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:50:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 310 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90786</link>
      <description>Depot clearances were treated in law as factory-gate sales, so the approved factory-gate price would ordinarily govern such removals. On the facts, however, buyers in Uttar Pradesh and buyers in West Bengal and Bihar formed different classes, making region-wise classification of buyers justified. The lower prices declared for depot clearances in the other States were therefore referable to a distinct buyer class and could not be rejected merely because a higher Uttar Pradesh factory-gate price had been declared. The price list for depot clearances was accordingly required to be accepted as declared and approved without modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>