<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 337 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90776</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on dyed nylon crimped yarn received under dealer invoices because the invoices contained the required particulars and duty had already been paid on the grey yarn before dyeing; the exemption applicable to the dyed yarn did not change the duty-paid character of the inputs. The objection that credit was taken on the basis of dealer invoices for exempted dyed yarn was therefore not sustainable. Delay in filing the Modvat declaration could also be condoned under Rule 57G(5) where an application for condonation had been filed and the inputs were received within the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 337 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90776</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on dyed nylon crimped yarn received under dealer invoices because the invoices contained the required particulars and duty had already been paid on the grey yarn before dyeing; the exemption applicable to the dyed yarn did not change the duty-paid character of the inputs. The objection that credit was taken on the basis of dealer invoices for exempted dyed yarn was therefore not sustainable. Delay in filing the Modvat declaration could also be condoned under Rule 57G(5) where an application for condonation had been filed and the inputs were received within the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>