<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90766</link>
    <description>Duty quantified on a finally approved price list must be based on actual figures when the provisional declaration was made subject to production of actuals. The principle applies both where the actual figures are lower and where they are higher than the provisional figures, so final assessment is not confined to downward adjustment alone. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions and treated the actual figures as governing the final quantification in either direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90766</link>
      <description>Duty quantified on a finally approved price list must be based on actual figures when the provisional declaration was made subject to production of actuals. The principle applies both where the actual figures are lower and where they are higher than the provisional figures, so final assessment is not confined to downward adjustment alone. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions and treated the actual figures as governing the final quantification in either direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>