<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 298 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90762</link>
    <description>Customs classification was not finally determined on the existing record because the dispute required fresh examination against the technical literature and HSN Notes. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration afresh. The related appeals arising from the remanded proceedings were directed to be heard together and decided expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 298 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90762</link>
      <description>Customs classification was not finally determined on the existing record because the dispute required fresh examination against the technical literature and HSN Notes. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration afresh. The related appeals arising from the remanded proceedings were directed to be heard together and decided expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>