<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 428 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (A)&#039;s order, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the classification of slotted angles under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Vice President concurred with the decision, emphasizing the importance of applying specific headings without reference to other interpretation rules, ultimately supporting the Collector (A)&#039;s classification of the product under Chapter Heading 72.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:35:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 428 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (A)&#039;s order, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the classification of slotted angles under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Vice President concurred with the decision, emphasizing the importance of applying specific headings without reference to other interpretation rules, ultimately supporting the Collector (A)&#039;s classification of the product under Chapter Heading 72.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>