<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90747</link>
    <description>For goods manufactured on a job-work basis and remunerated through job charges, the assessable value could not be artificially enhanced by adding an estimated manufacturing profit. Where the Department accepted that the job worker received only the agreed job charges and no separate consideration, those charges were treated as covering the manufacturing cost and the job worker&#039;s profit. On that basis, there was no legal foundation for a further duty demand on a presumed profit element, and the differential excise duty claim was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:28:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90747</link>
      <description>For goods manufactured on a job-work basis and remunerated through job charges, the assessable value could not be artificially enhanced by adding an estimated manufacturing profit. Where the Department accepted that the job worker received only the agreed job charges and no separate consideration, those charges were treated as covering the manufacturing cost and the job worker&#039;s profit. On that basis, there was no legal foundation for a further duty demand on a presumed profit element, and the differential excise duty claim was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>