<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 343 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90746</link>
    <description>Intercoms used for internal office communication were distinguished from telephones for tariff classification because, although they transmit and receive messages, they operate within a confined establishment and are not treated as telephones in the popular sense. Applying that distinction, the Tribunal followed the existing reasoning and classified the goods under Heading 84.79 as machines and mechanical appliances having individual functions, not under Heading 85.17 as electrical apparatus for line telephony or line telegraphy. The departmental challenge to the classification was rejected and the assessee&#039;s favourable classification was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:25:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 343 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90746</link>
      <description>Intercoms used for internal office communication were distinguished from telephones for tariff classification because, although they transmit and receive messages, they operate within a confined establishment and are not treated as telephones in the popular sense. Applying that distinction, the Tribunal followed the existing reasoning and classified the goods under Heading 84.79 as machines and mechanical appliances having individual functions, not under Heading 85.17 as electrical apparatus for line telephony or line telegraphy. The departmental challenge to the classification was rejected and the assessee&#039;s favourable classification was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>