<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 438 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the question of exemption under Notification No. 119/78-C.E. for brass utensils manufactured from scrap and duty-paid untrimmed circles was already settled by earlier Tribunal and High Court decisions. As the issue was no longer res integra, it followed the binding precedent and treated that ratio as governing the dispute. The denial of notification benefit was therefore set aside, and the assessee was held entitled to the exemption-related relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 438 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the question of exemption under Notification No. 119/78-C.E. for brass utensils manufactured from scrap and duty-paid untrimmed circles was already settled by earlier Tribunal and High Court decisions. As the issue was no longer res integra, it followed the binding precedent and treated that ratio as governing the dispute. The denial of notification benefit was therefore set aside, and the assessee was held entitled to the exemption-related relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>