<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 159 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Crayplas Compound is marketable based on evidence of similar imported goods. The classification issue was remanded for re-determination under Chapter 96. The limitation period for duty demand was not directly addressed and remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a detailed examination by the lower authority of the facts and legal principles involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 159 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Crayplas Compound is marketable based on evidence of similar imported goods. The classification issue was remanded for re-determination under Chapter 96. The limitation period for duty demand was not directly addressed and remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a detailed examination by the lower authority of the facts and legal principles involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>