https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90682 The tribunal directed the main appellant to make a further deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs by a specified date, with the option of paying in installments. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty for all appellants was waived, and recovery stayed. Despite the financial hardship plea, the tribunal found that the appellants had not effectively presented their case regarding the quantification of the demand, leading to the additional deposit requirement. The tribunal considered evidence provided by the department, including employee statements and documents, in reaching its decision. en-us Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90682 The tribunal directed the main appellant to make a further deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs by a specified date, with the option of paying in installments. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty for all appellants was waived, and recovery stayed. Despite the financial hardship plea, the tribunal found that the appellants had not effectively presented their case regarding the quantification of the demand, leading to the additional deposit requirement. The tribunal considered evidence provided by the department, including employee statements and documents, in reaching its decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90682