<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 289 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90679</link>
    <description>The case involved the valuation of goods cleared by Export Oriented Units (EOU) to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The appellants contended that the invoice price should be accepted as the transaction value, citing a Board Circular and comparable prices charged by competitors. The court emphasized the relevance of the Board&#039;s criteria for assessment and remanded the appeals for re-determining the assessable value in alignment with the circular. The penalty imposed on the appellants was deemed unjustified as the original clearances were based on documents provided by the appellants, leading to the conclusion that penalties were unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 289 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90679</link>
      <description>The case involved the valuation of goods cleared by Export Oriented Units (EOU) to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The appellants contended that the invoice price should be accepted as the transaction value, citing a Board Circular and comparable prices charged by competitors. The court emphasized the relevance of the Board&#039;s criteria for assessment and remanded the appeals for re-determining the assessable value in alignment with the circular. The penalty imposed on the appellants was deemed unjustified as the original clearances were based on documents provided by the appellants, leading to the conclusion that penalties were unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>