<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 235 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90676</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on glass bottles routed through intermediaries was denied because the assessee did not prove continuous identity of the duty-paid goods covered by the endorsed gate passes. The record showed only a reasonable correlation, while the possibility that bottles from other sources had been received was not excluded. In the absence of firm documentary evidence establishing continuity of movement, identity of the goods, and the duty-paid nature of the same goods throughout the chain, credit was held inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 235 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90676</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on glass bottles routed through intermediaries was denied because the assessee did not prove continuous identity of the duty-paid goods covered by the endorsed gate passes. The record showed only a reasonable correlation, while the possibility that bottles from other sources had been received was not excluded. In the absence of firm documentary evidence establishing continuity of movement, identity of the goods, and the duty-paid nature of the same goods throughout the chain, credit was held inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>