<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 232 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90673</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal held that the rubberised self-adhesive tape of cotton cloth should be classified under Tariff Heading 59.05, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s reliance on Heading 59.06 and affirming the assessee&#039;s original claim made in 1986. The judgment emphasizes the importance of factual accuracy in classification disputes and the need to align with both the Central Excise Tariff Act and relevant international standards like the HSN.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 232 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90673</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal held that the rubberised self-adhesive tape of cotton cloth should be classified under Tariff Heading 59.05, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s reliance on Heading 59.06 and affirming the assessee&#039;s original claim made in 1986. The judgment emphasizes the importance of factual accuracy in classification disputes and the need to align with both the Central Excise Tariff Act and relevant international standards like the HSN.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>