<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 328 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90660</link>
    <description>Popcorn was held outside Tariff Heading 1904.10, which covered corn flakes and wheat flakes put up in unit containers for sale. Applying the plain wording of the tariff entry, the classification adopted by the lower authority was found unsustainable because popcorn did not squarely answer that description. As the demand depended on that classification, it could not survive. The assessee&#039;s classification position was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:05:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 328 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90660</link>
      <description>Popcorn was held outside Tariff Heading 1904.10, which covered corn flakes and wheat flakes put up in unit containers for sale. Applying the plain wording of the tariff entry, the classification adopted by the lower authority was found unsustainable because popcorn did not squarely answer that description. As the demand depended on that classification, it could not survive. The assessee&#039;s classification position was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>