<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 428 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90617</link>
    <description>Eligibility of Modvat credit on low sulphur heavy stock and furnace oil used in diesel generating sets to produce electricity for captive use in caustic soda manufacture was examined under Rule 57A. The analysis noted that Tribunal decisions had diverged: one line allowed credit where electricity generated within the factory was used in manufacture, while another rejected it unless technical integrality with the manufacturing process was shown. In view of the conflicting interpretations and the significance of the 1995 amendment expressly referring to inputs used for generation of electricity, the issue was considered appropriate for authoritative determination by a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 428 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90617</link>
      <description>Eligibility of Modvat credit on low sulphur heavy stock and furnace oil used in diesel generating sets to produce electricity for captive use in caustic soda manufacture was examined under Rule 57A. The analysis noted that Tribunal decisions had diverged: one line allowed credit where electricity generated within the factory was used in manufacture, while another rejected it unless technical integrality with the manufacturing process was shown. In view of the conflicting interpretations and the significance of the 1995 amendment expressly referring to inputs used for generation of electricity, the issue was considered appropriate for authoritative determination by a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>