<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 393 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90579</link>
    <description>Limitation for demanding reversal of Modvat credit taken before filing the declaration was computed from the date the RT 12 return was filed, or should have been filed, because that return and its supporting records were statutory assessment documents. On the facts, the show cause notice was issued beyond six months from the RT 12 return date, so the demand was barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 393 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90579</link>
      <description>Limitation for demanding reversal of Modvat credit taken before filing the declaration was computed from the date the RT 12 return was filed, or should have been filed, because that return and its supporting records were statutory assessment documents. On the facts, the show cause notice was issued beyond six months from the RT 12 return date, so the demand was barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>