<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90576</link>
    <description>Where the inclusion of software value in the assessable value of computer systems was already under reference to a Larger Bench, Tribunal practice favoured maintaining status quo by waiving pre-deposit and staying recovery pending authoritative determination. The earlier view supporting inclusion was adverse to the applicants, but its correctness was in doubt and the same issue was sub judice before the Larger Bench. Without expressing any prima facie view on merits, the Tribunal treated the pending reference and the disputed valuation question as sufficient grounds to defer recovery until the larger bench ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:33:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90576</link>
      <description>Where the inclusion of software value in the assessable value of computer systems was already under reference to a Larger Bench, Tribunal practice favoured maintaining status quo by waiving pre-deposit and staying recovery pending authoritative determination. The earlier view supporting inclusion was adverse to the applicants, but its correctness was in doubt and the same issue was sub judice before the Larger Bench. Without expressing any prima facie view on merits, the Tribunal treated the pending reference and the disputed valuation question as sufficient grounds to defer recovery until the larger bench ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>