<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 271 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90573</link>
    <description>Transport, handling and service charges recovered separately after factory-gate sale were treated as post-clearance expenses and excluded from assessable value under Section 4(1)(a), which bases valuation on the wholesale cash price at the factory gate. The charges related to transportation after sale, unloading and stocking at the buyer&#039;s godown, and service-linked recovery on credit sales, so they did not form part of the value of the goods. On the same reasoning, penalty under Rule 173Q was held unsustainable because the valuation position adopted by the assessee reflected a correct interpretation and no deliberate intention to evade duty was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 271 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90573</link>
      <description>Transport, handling and service charges recovered separately after factory-gate sale were treated as post-clearance expenses and excluded from assessable value under Section 4(1)(a), which bases valuation on the wholesale cash price at the factory gate. The charges related to transportation after sale, unloading and stocking at the buyer&#039;s godown, and service-linked recovery on credit sales, so they did not form part of the value of the goods. On the same reasoning, penalty under Rule 173Q was held unsustainable because the valuation position adopted by the assessee reflected a correct interpretation and no deliberate intention to evade duty was found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>