<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 239 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90571</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the Reference Application, allowing Modvat benefit for ramming mass based on precedent and the decision of the Larger Bench under Section 35F(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:28:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 239 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90571</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the Reference Application, allowing Modvat benefit for ramming mass based on precedent and the decision of the Larger Bench under Section 35F(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>