<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90569</link>
    <description>Excise duty collected provisionally on Maida was later neutralised by an exemption notification covering the same levy cycle, and the refund was held payable on that basis. The issue was treated as governed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court decision on identical facts, and no contrary authority was shown for the Department. The appellants were therefore entitled to refund of the duty collected for the relevant period, with consequential relief following.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90569</link>
      <description>Excise duty collected provisionally on Maida was later neutralised by an exemption notification covering the same levy cycle, and the refund was held payable on that basis. The issue was treated as governed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court decision on identical facts, and no contrary authority was shown for the Department. The appellants were therefore entitled to refund of the duty collected for the relevant period, with consequential relief following.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>