<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90560</link>
    <description>An exemption notification conditioned on use in the electronic industry was construed strictly, so it did not extend to a feeder manufacturing unit whose machinery was used only to make laminates later supplied to electronics units. The majority held that the importer itself was not engaged in the specified industry, and the absence of the word &quot;exclusively&quot; did not widen the exemption by implication. The later deletion of the words &quot;used in the Electronic Industry&quot; was treated as a substantive change, not a clarification of the earlier notification. On that view, the imported trimming plant and accessories were not eligible for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90560</link>
      <description>An exemption notification conditioned on use in the electronic industry was construed strictly, so it did not extend to a feeder manufacturing unit whose machinery was used only to make laminates later supplied to electronics units. The majority held that the importer itself was not engaged in the specified industry, and the absence of the word &quot;exclusively&quot; did not widen the exemption by implication. The later deletion of the words &quot;used in the Electronic Industry&quot; was treated as a substantive change, not a clarification of the earlier notification. On that view, the imported trimming plant and accessories were not eligible for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>