<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 300 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside charges of misdeclaration of value and misclassification, allowing the goods to be cleared upon mutilation under Customs supervision. The declared value was accepted for basic customs duty, with countervailing duty assessed under CET sub-heading 4011.99. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 50,000 each, as the Tribunal found no misdeclaration or undervaluation, noting accurate goods description in the Bill of Entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 300 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside charges of misdeclaration of value and misclassification, allowing the goods to be cleared upon mutilation under Customs supervision. The declared value was accepted for basic customs duty, with countervailing duty assessed under CET sub-heading 4011.99. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 50,000 each, as the Tribunal found no misdeclaration or undervaluation, noting accurate goods description in the Bill of Entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>