https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90543 Where an appeal had earlier been treated as prima facie arguable and recovery had been stayed, dismissal for non-compliance with a later pre-deposit direction was found inappropriate in the circumstances. The prolonged pendency of the dispute and the case posture made insistence on pre-deposit unsuitable, so the matter was required to be decided on merits. The lower order was set aside and the Commissioner was directed to hear the appeal without insisting on pre-deposit. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:41:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90543 Where an appeal had earlier been treated as prima facie arguable and recovery had been stayed, dismissal for non-compliance with a later pre-deposit direction was found inappropriate in the circumstances. The prolonged pendency of the dispute and the case posture made insistence on pre-deposit unsuitable, so the matter was required to be decided on merits. The lower order was set aside and the Commissioner was directed to hear the appeal without insisting on pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90543