<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 298 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90538</link>
    <description>A delay-condonation application based on the applicant&#039;s illness and a medical certificate was found insufficient where the husband was handling the day-to-day affairs and service of the adjudication order on him at the same address was treated as valid. On those facts, the explanation did not establish sufficient cause for the prolonged delay, and the application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:43:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 298 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90538</link>
      <description>A delay-condonation application based on the applicant&#039;s illness and a medical certificate was found insufficient where the husband was handling the day-to-day affairs and service of the adjudication order on him at the same address was treated as valid. On those facts, the explanation did not establish sufficient cause for the prolonged delay, and the application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>