<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 297 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90537</link>
    <description>Interpretation of customs exemption notifications under the pass book scheme turned on whether the Tribunal had competence to decide the rate of credit and whether a notification governing duty payment in convertible foreign currency could control credit under a separate scheme. The Tribunal held the jurisdiction objection failed because the dispute concerned interpretation of exemption notifications under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act. It also held Notification No. 117/94-Customs was inapplicable, as its conditions differed from Notification No. 104/95-Customs and were not satisfied. Credit had to be computed under the scheme-specific notification on the tariff basis, and the assessee&#039;s credit entitlement was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 297 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90537</link>
      <description>Interpretation of customs exemption notifications under the pass book scheme turned on whether the Tribunal had competence to decide the rate of credit and whether a notification governing duty payment in convertible foreign currency could control credit under a separate scheme. The Tribunal held the jurisdiction objection failed because the dispute concerned interpretation of exemption notifications under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act. It also held Notification No. 117/94-Customs was inapplicable, as its conditions differed from Notification No. 104/95-Customs and were not satisfied. Credit had to be computed under the scheme-specific notification on the tariff basis, and the assessee&#039;s credit entitlement was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>