<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 296 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90536</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Central Excise&#039;s order imposing duty, confiscation, and penalties on the appellants and related parties for alleged clandestine removal of cigarettes. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to prove clandestine manufacture and removal, granting the benefit of doubt to the appellants. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and consequential relief was granted in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:41:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 296 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90536</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Central Excise&#039;s order imposing duty, confiscation, and penalties on the appellants and related parties for alleged clandestine removal of cigarettes. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to prove clandestine manufacture and removal, granting the benefit of doubt to the appellants. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and consequential relief was granted in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>