<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 313 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90526</link>
    <description>Push button telephone instruments were held not to qualify as capital goods under Notification No. 123/81 because the notification gave no definition and the term had to be read in the broader statutory and policy context. Capital goods were understood as plant, machinery, equipment or accessories used for production, directly or indirectly, while Rule 57-Q reflected the need for participation in manufacture. Telephone instruments were part of a communication system and aided efficient operations, but they did not directly or indirectly participate in the manufacturing process of the assessee&#039;s product. The appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 313 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90526</link>
      <description>Push button telephone instruments were held not to qualify as capital goods under Notification No. 123/81 because the notification gave no definition and the term had to be read in the broader statutory and policy context. Capital goods were understood as plant, machinery, equipment or accessories used for production, directly or indirectly, while Rule 57-Q reflected the need for participation in manufacture. Telephone instruments were part of a communication system and aided efficient operations, but they did not directly or indirectly participate in the manufacturing process of the assessee&#039;s product. The appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>